Eyewitnesses are persons who witnessed a crime being committed against them or another person. List of Pros of Eyewitness Testimony 1. It Can Implicate the Wrong Person. Because of this though, eyewitnesses can only be credible if their version of the story is comprehensible, consistent and cohesive.
When that happens, people might remember things or events differently. Because there is this heightened perception, however, there is actually a lack of mental resources available for memories to be committed.
Because of this natural circumstance, eyewitness testimony of events that happened years ago may just disappear. This might lead them into saying something that is wrong or inaccurate.
Oftentimes, stories are retold in a way that is tailored to the listener, distorting the memory. But a lot of these crimes go unpunished due mostly to the lack of evidence.
Have you ever noticed that it becomes more difficult to remember certain events as time goes by? When this is presented to the authorities and in court, the judge and the investigators will be able to better understand and envision exactly what occurred.
It is generally reliable. These findings indicate that eyewitness testimony may not be accurate sometimes. Eyewitness testimony can convict the wrong person.
It Heavily Rests on the Credibility of the Witness. But for a person to swear he or she is telling the truth does not really make his or her sworn statement the truth, does it?
Some of the subjects falsely remembered seeing images that were not there during a certain incident. The experiments also involved injecting words in certain questions that lead the subjects to incorrectly provide accounts of what they saw.
Everyone has a certain personal bias. In court, they will frequently be asked if they could identify the suspect. Indeed, the eyes can be deceiving.
The trauma of witnessing a crime, and the fear of being implicated into the chaos or being an object of revenge, are enough to dilute their supposedly reliable and honest accounts of the crime.Transcript of EYE WITNESS TESTIMONY IN COURT.
COURT PROCESS COURT PROCESS Court Process Memory of Eyewitnesses Psychological Components Cognitive Interview Pros & Cons PROS & CONS PSYCHOLOGICAL COMPONENTS COGNITIVE INTERVIEW Eyewitness testimony is likely the most significant evidence of the.
View Essay - Essay #2 from PSYCH at Virginia Tech.
What are the pros and cons of using eyewitness testimony in legal cases? Do you think we should rely on eyewitness testimony? Why or why%(3).
What are the advantages of having an eyewitness testimony? Update Cancel. Answer Wiki.
3 Answers. Oluremi Ogundana. Answered Feb 15, What are the pros and cons of eyewitness testimony? What are some barriers eyewitness testimonies come across? How reliable is eyewitness testimony? Since eyewitness testimony can be a powerful source of evidence to prove a set of facts in a legal matter, it is critical that the testimony be accurate and reliable.
List of Cons of Eyewitness Testimony.
1. Eyewitness testimony may not always be accurate. Several studies have been conducted in the past on human memory and on people’s capacity to remember events and details, some of which were erroneously recorded and stored in their minds. List of Cons of Eyewitness Testimony.
1. It Heavily Rests on the Credibility of the Witness. The jury tends to believe and uphold the sworn statement of a “credible” eyewitness.Download