This claim is countered by a judge by the name of Stephen Reinhardt. For treatment, cancer patients are given chemotherapy, a form of radioactive medicine that is poisonous to the body.
This ruling is the strongest defense for the right to assisted suicide.
For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill. Furthermore, to administer numerous drugs to a terminal patient and place him or her on medical equipment does not help anything except the disease itself. Finally, many terminal patients want the right to assisted suicide because it is a means to endure their end without the unnecessary suffering and cost.
But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide. But, successful or not, medicine has a high price attached to it. Human life is expensive, and in the hospital there are only a few affluent terminal patients who can afford to prolong what life is left in them.
Most, also, believe that the right to assisted suicide is an inherent right which does not have to be given to the individual. To give competent, terminally-ill adults this necessary right is to give them the autonomy to close the book on a life well-lived.
It is all right, please do not worry anymore. For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures.
Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia.
A competent terminal patient must have the option of assisted suicide because it is in the best interest of that person.
The choice of assisted suicide would allow these terminally ill patients to end the sorrow and griefof their families as well as their own misery.
The choice would also put a halt to the financial worries of these families. On the other side of the issue, however, people who are against assisted suicide do not believe that the terminally ill have the right to end their suffering.
This oath cannot be applied to cancer patients. The terminally ill also have rights like normal, healthy citizens do and they cannot be denied the right not to suffer.
Most terminal patients want their death to be a peaceful one and with as much consolation as possible. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing.
A competent dying person has some knowledge of this, and with every day that he or she is kept alive, the hospital costs skyrocket. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. They claim that terminal patients might be forced to choose assisted suicide because of their financial situation.
When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. This right would allow them to leave this earth with dignity, save their families from financial ruin, and relieve them of insufferable pain.
The right to assisted suicide must be freely bestowed upon those who are terminally ill. As a result of chemotherapy, the body suffers incredible pain, hair loss, vomiting, and other extremely unpleasant side effects.Yet I think the term “Physician Assisted Death” is evasive and euphemistic.
Physicians have for centuries helped patients to die—that is, to endure the process that ends in their death. Physicians have for centuries helped patients to die—that is, to endure the process that ends in their death. Euthanasia Essay: Assisted Suicide is Wrong Words | 5 Pages.
Assisted Suicide is Wrong A Saskatchewan farmer, Robert Latimer, was sentenced to life in prison last year for the second-degree murder of his severely disabled daughter, Tracy.
Assisted Suicide is Wrong A Saskatchewan farmer, Robert Latimer, was sentenced to life in prison last year for the second-degree murder of his severely disabled daughter, Tracy. He asphyxiated her with exhaust from his pick-up (Heinrich).
Assisted Suicide is somewhat related to Euthanasia. In the end, obviously, legalizing assisted suicide is not the right choice. Not only that people can survive terminal illness so it would be a total complete waste of their lives, but you lose the ability of controlling your life and it’s a bad influence on everyone.
Assisted Suicide Jennifer Berger PHI Mind and Machine Samuel Grummons September 12, Assisted suicide, it’s a very controversial topic. Some people are for it and many more are against it as it pushes the moral boundaries of right and wrong. Physician Assisted Suicide, Is it Right or Wrong SOC May 9, Physician Assisted Suicide, Is it Right or Wrong?
The ethical issues of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) are both emotional and controversial, as it ranks right up there with abortion.Download